On this page you can get a detailed analysis of a word or phrase, produced by the best artificial intelligence technology to date:
[wʌn'ʌpmənʃɪp]
шутливое выражение
умение добиться преимущества (умение поставить противника в невыгодное положение, сбить его с толку и т.п.)
дословная передача
преимущество в одно очко; по названию книги С.Поттера [Stephen Potter] "One Upmanship", 1952
существительное
общая лексика
умение перещеголять других
разговорное выражение
умение добиться преимущества
поставить соперника в невыгодное положение и т. п.
One-upmanship, also called "one-upsmanship", is the art or practice of successively outdoing a competitor. The term was first used in the title of a book by Stephen Potter, published in 1952 as a follow-up to The Theory and Practice of Gamesmanship (or the Art of Winning Games without Actually Cheating) (1947), and Lifemanship titles in his series of tongue-in-cheek self-help books, and film and television derivatives, that teach various ploys to achieve this. This comic satire of self-help style guides manipulates traditional British conventions for the gamester, all life being a game, who understands that if you're not one-up, you're one-down. Potter's unprincipled principles apply to almost any possession, experience or situation, deriving maximum undeserved rewards and discomfitting the opposition. The 1960 film School for Scoundrels and its 2006 remake were satiric portrayals of how to use Potter's ideas.
In that context, the term refers to a satiric course in the gambits required for the systematic and conscious practice of "creative intimidation", making one's associates feel inferior and thereby gaining the status of being "one-up" on them. Viewed seriously, it is a phenomenon of group dynamics that can have significant effects in the management field: for instance, manifesting in office politics.